Friday, October 15, 2010

Operation Homecoming

           Soldiers go into war with illusions of grandeur. We are taught growing up that war is all about serving your country, doing your patriotic duty. As an average American, one doesn’t realize what actually goes on inside a warzone. We depend on the newscasters to inform us, to give us the watered down version. The National Endowment for the Arts created a program called Operation Homecoming. This program teaches soldiers to write about their experiences in the wars. These stories allow the soldiers to explain the realities and emotions that are experienced in war.
            A soldier named Gyokeres talks about war becoming black and white. It becomes “Kill or be killed”, and goes on to say that “war has nothing to do with what you believe” (Operation Homecoming). I think he means that what it boils down to is doing your job and trying to make home every day.   It goes with the essay I wrote about Sean Huze and Tim O’Brien’s work. I tried to explain how religion has little place in war and that the loss of oneself has little to do with what one is taught to believe and follow. When the solider enters a warzone they spend more time following orders they may not understand and trying to stay alive. Sometimes the right and wrongs you were taught just never come into play. This contradiction between what is ordered and what was taught seemed to have caused some inner pain to the soldiers.
            Soldier John McCary had a quote that I feel showed the importance of what the soldiers are actually fighting for. He said “Breath is sweet, sleep is sweeter, friends are priceless. And you cry. There’s no point, no gain, no benefit but you are human and you must mourn…you will live though you’re not ever again sure why” (Operation Homecoming). This quote moved me a lot because you realize that the people that they are over there with become more than just their friends, they are brothers and sisters. The war becomes fighting for the people next to you instead of the governmental agenda. Questions arise in the survivors, things like “Why him and not me?” McCary talked about going on in the war to respect his fallen comrades. If they would have stopped just because their friends were killed then they would have died for nothing.
            It upset me to hear about the inconsistencies that the American public is told. To know that all we hear is a watered down version shows that there are ulterior motives pushing our soldiers into dying. If the public knew what actually went on inside those countries that we invaded I’m sure that there would be an outrage. Yet on the flip side if the American public actually wanted to know, they would. We live blind so we don’t have to feel anything about it, we can claim innocence. It’s a way of protecting ourselves from the truth so we don’t question the real motives behind the war.
            Watching this helped me better understand why Huze and O’Brien had to write what they did. They didn’t write about the war because they wanted to as much as they needed to. They needed to write about it, to tell someone, so they didn’t go crazy. Holding all those experiences inside would hinder someone’s ability to function. It helped me understand that they needed someone to hear them and understand what they went through. They hoped that by telling their stories people may not be so naïve and think that it’s all about killing and being a hero. Even though O’Brien embellished his stories, he tried to draw on the reader, to show them that what you hear isn’t what is actually being said. He, like Operation Homecoming, was trying to tell you that the impact goes deeper than what is just on the surface; that these soldiers see and do things that they have to live with and that they are not proud of.
            I hope that by these soldier’s testimonies people with become enlightened and informed. I hope that it causes people to question closer the reasons behind our soldiers dying. Unfortunately people take the blame out on the soldier’s instead of the people ordering them. If things like this video were more forced on people maybe they would understand. Earnest Hemmingway said “Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime” (Operation Homecoming). It’s a crime to put our soldiers through the stress they endure for any reason other than protecting our country instead of someone’s agenda. I am grateful for what they do and I don’t blame them for the orders that they are given. They do what they are told and do their job proudly, boldly and to the fullest extent of their lives.

Works Cited:
Operation Homecoming. Richard E. Robbins. ITVS.The Documentary Group. 2007. Film
Picture from: http://www.filmforum.org/films/operation/OperationHomecoming_Art2_02.jpg

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Mid Session Letter

Dear Mrs. Cline,
            Since I tested into Honors English, I was apprehensive about whether or not I would be bored in taking English 101 and 102. I have to say I was impressed and glad that I decided to take the lower level classes instead. Your class, so far, has helped me in better developing my different writing techniques. I have always had a problem knowing where to start when I begin to write a paper. Once I have it, it comes easily but the starting process is difficult. I think that my biggest success in this class is being able to not worry about posting my assignments for everyone to see. I am really not sure why in this class is does not seem to bother me. It could be because everyone has to do it, so I’m not being singled out.
            The readings in this class have been eye-opening for me. To be able to see the extent of the stress that war causes is disconcerting. My career goal probably has a lot to do with my interest in reading these texts. My goal is to be a trauma management therapist, which deals with PTSD, among other things. Huze and O’Brien’s texts have created a better understanding of the depths of stress that is caused. To know that someone can completely lose themselves internally only adds to the fact that they could lose their lives at anytime.
            Literary analysis is different for me because in previous papers you were either summarizing or writing about opinions. Literary Analysis shows you how to argue while being able to back up your arguments with the texts you have read. The reason that I like this is because I can formulate my own opinion about what I think the writer is trying to portray as long as I can back it up with citations from the texts.
            I can’t say that I actually have goals for what I want to learn in this class. I would like to improve my writing skills and know what I do well and what still needs work. I would like to see more informative peer reviews if we continue doing them. Again I am glad that I chose to take your recommended class and I hope that the rest of the semester is as enlightening as the first half.

Thank you,
Theresa Murray